writes Elisa _ 7 James writes _12
dear all, I apologize
first absence in the first riunione.Dunque I tried to answer as soon as the first strain, but given my extreme slowness in reading I had to print things on the screen, read the proposals, the objections, the so-called thematic groups (I was afraid to write some nonsensical sfondone) etc etc: I know one thing very long.
First, I'd have some little doubt it had been informed, say, only through the various e-mail: I read that the theme or topic "framework" is very large (man and technology, human-body-machine), although not as generic as the body, etc. nothing. I realized then that inside the container can coinvivere a number of sensitive issues to the experience of micro-study of each ...
yes, I think just the claim to better define the terms of discourse.: Technology, machine etc. Personally, I suggest many things, but I do not know what may be relevant to the project that you thought. I think it also fair (and natural) to report a bibliographic reference, as has been said-or better-written Now that I think would be odd to think to write a whole article on the meanings of the items "technology", "machine" etc, a kind of Freud's sull'unheimliche, gutting a curious word. The rest would be trivial to think of the car for what it is today only. I do not know which of the e-mail seems to have read something on the machines Verne.quella so fantastic that it seems to me a brilliant idea (at this very night I happened to "climb" on nautilus ....) .
Other ideas, speaking in terms of its fresh and simple (unfortunately not a pure literary and a little ashamed): I can think of a whole series of issues on the machine from the cinema (the bureaucratic machine of
Brazil, the world is overcrowded of gadgets and machinery Human Blade Runner, Metropolis ...), and also the old theater (performance related to the mutual stimulation of car and actor), music (I'm writing right now, an introductory page on this artist Zazou, the French- who wrote an electronic score, while a painter who painted in
videos: yes, two neutral). In fact, now that I think, come to mind also the machinery of
Duchamp (the "spouse", with its creaking sensual! So, again, the sensual man-machine relationship.) Well, I might think of these arguments improperly in relation to publishing project. Look for this one
your clarification. I also visited the site of the Companion secret that graphic .... ! As I read, among other things, I discovered a warning with a curious resonance, in technical terms a "reason", I like to tell you (but maybe too long a speech ...): the "secret sharer" of non-conrad Another is that the "reason for travel companion, also in the Book of Tobit
and Andersen. It is a spectral figure, an angel, a messaggero.Insomma, I'm really bored.
I greet you all. Elisa
0 comments:
Post a Comment