Dear James and dear all, unfortunately
fate is against me and once again I "rate" the meeting set last week!
In short, I offer my duties against proposing "homework" tumbler in the email above. Since then a teacher, I can not help in any way from track to deliver all the obligations attached and connected to my participation, even if only the media, until now, the noble undertaking.
I come to the point: I would like to include in the dyad man-machine interface to analyze some passages, at the beginning of the century, relative to the dis-humanizing figures (puppets, automata, homme-cible) in the Chants de la mi-mort Alberto Savino, alias Andrea De Chirico. In this way I could bring water to my mill, or working on a text that I know pretty well, tracing the coordinates of a broader discussion, aimed between models and existential aesthetic avant-garde experimentation.
However, in general, setting, I share the concerns of those who raise questions of method and add that definition must be met and be theoretically shared by the group, so that those same may be "tested" by field surveys which then no longer have to ask scruples than a scattered proceed.
I mean the container, although flexible, must define a field of possible applications. But this operation does not follow logically precedes and investigations on the same field!
Otherwise the risk, to which myself and the first yield, is to return to the topic within its own field of research that had existed before and independently of the noble enterprise!
If the problem is that you have to start somewhere, but I share the doubt, radical, and that doing so will come out a framework and fascinating graziso the interests of each rather than a clear and defined (in its problematic ') area of \u200b\u200bresearch.
I refer you to the ball and wish everyone good job
soon
0 comments:
Post a Comment